News

Oct. 1, 2013
Details about the CASMI 2013 Special Issue and dates are now available!

Sept. 24, 2013
The rules and challenge data pages have been updated.

Sept. 2, 2013
The CASMI 2013 Challenges have been officially released!

August 29, 2013
The challenges for CASMI2013 will be released on Monday, September 2nd!

August 29, 2013
The CASMI 2012 poster will be presented in Langenau in November 2013


Results in Category 4

Summary of Rank by Challenge and Participant

Unfortunately we did not receive any external submissions for this category. The challenges were approached in as unbiased a way as possible, without adjusting the scoring to obtain optimal results. Nevertheless, the results could be be quite different if these challenges were undertaken by an independent lab.

schymane
eims_challenge1 20
eims_challenge2 1
eims_challenge3 3
eims_challenge4 2
eims_challenge5 2
eims_challenge6 5
eims_challenge7 1
eims_challenge8 1
eims_challenge9 3
eims_challenge10 2
eims_challenge11 1
eims_challenge12 1
eims_challenge13 13
eims_challenge14 1
eims_challenge15 1
eims_challenge16 1

Participant information and abstracts

ParticipantID:        schymane
Category:             category4
Authors:              Schymanski, Emma(1) and Meringer, Markus (2)
Affiliations:         (1) Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and 
                      Technology, Überlandstrasse 133, CH-8600 Dübendorf, 
                      Switzerland (2) DLR: German Aerospace Centre,
                      Münchnerstrasse 20, D-82234 Oberpfaffenhofen-Wessling,
                      Germany

Automatic pipeline:   partially
Spectral libraries:   yes

Abstract:

We processed Category 4 challenges with the MOLGEN-MS, using
classifier information from both MOLGEN-MS and the NIST 2011
library. NIST classifiers were added manually.  Candidates were
fragmented using the MOLGEN-MS "ReNeGe" module to get match values.
These were then supplemented with additional information including
partitioning information and steric energy. log Kow values were
calculated with EPI Suite. File conversions were performed with
Notepad++ and OpenBabel (SDF => SMILES/InChI). Steric energy was
calculated with MOLGEN-QSPR, adding hydrogens then performing 10
iterations of the 3D optimisation before calculating the steric energy
index and exporting to plain text.  Candidates were scored taking into
account the match values from MOLGEN-MS, the steric energy and, for
Challenges 3-16, also whether the candidate was in the expected log
Kow range or not.  This led to a consensus score 
of (MV/100 + (1-E/max(E)))/2 for Challenges 1 and 2 
and (MV/100 + KowYN + (1-E/max(E)))/2 for the remaining challenges,
where KowYN = 1 if the candidate was within the logKow range +/- 1 
and 0 if outside this range.




Details per Challenge and Participant. See legend at bottom for more details

The table is also available as CSV download

participant category challenge rank tc bc wc ec rrp p wbc wwc wec wrrp
schymane category4 eims_challenge1 20 93 18 73 2 0.80 0.02 0.31 0.66 0.02 0.67
schymane category4 eims_challenge2 1 80 0 79 1 1.00 0.02 0.00 0.98 0.00 1.00
schymane category4 eims_challenge3 3 3 2 0 1 0.00 0.33 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.33
schymane category4 eims_challenge4 2 3 1 1 1 0.50 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.67
schymane category4 eims_challenge5 2 3 0 1 2 0.75 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.67
schymane category4 eims_challenge6 5 187 4 182 1 0.98 0.01 0.02 0.97 0.00 0.98
schymane category4 eims_challenge7 1 3 0 2 1 1.00 0.33 0.00 0.67 0.00 1.00
schymane category4 eims_challenge8 1 90 0 89 1 1.00 0.01 0.00 0.99 0.00 1.00
schymane category4 eims_challenge9 3 3 2 0 1 0.00 0.33 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.33
schymane category4 eims_challenge10 2 6 1 4 1 0.80 0.17 0.17 0.67 0.00 0.83
schymane category4 eims_challenge11 1 45 0 44 1 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.91 0.00 1.00
schymane category4 eims_challenge12 1 1 0 0 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
schymane category4 eims_challenge13 13 13 12 0 1 0.00 0.02 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.02
schymane category4 eims_challenge14 1 1 0 0 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
schymane category4 eims_challenge15 1 19 0 18 1 1.00 0.07 0.00 0.93 0.00 1.00
schymane category4 eims_challenge16 1 1 0 0 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00

Table legend:

rank
Absolute rank of correct solution
tc
Total number of candidates
bc
Number of candidates with a score better than correct solution
wc
Number of candidates with a score worse than correct solution
ec
Number of candidates with same score as the correct solution
rrp
Relative ranking position (1.0 is good, 0.0 is not)
p
Score of correct solution
wbc
Sum of scores better than correct solution
wwc
Sum of scores worse than correct solution
wec
Sum of scores equal to correct solution
wrrp
RRP weighted by the scores (1 is good)